by
Scott Jones

A concerted effort has been underway for the past several generations to alter the pronunciation of the Divine Name, known as the Tetragrammaton, from Jehovah into the Egyptian slur, Yahweh. In spite of these efforts, there is compelling evidence to stick with the traditional pronunciation.

Although a few elementary matters will be explained, this paper will assume that the reader has at least a basic knowledge of this issue. Therefore, those who read with a critical eye should not expect me to deal exhaustively with the technical issues, such as explaining in detail the points, the variations when the word occurs in certain combinations, its root construction, and so forth. On the other hand, the following demonstration will override most any discussions along these lines anyway, and will bring to light much that grammatical speculations and other assumptions can only prevaricate over. Thus, I will only be hitting the highlights - and generally at that - yet hopefully in such a way that even those who are not terribly familiar with this issue will still be able to keep up.

Finally, the information presented here is information that is not widely known in mainstream Christian circles, so I am confident that even those who feel comfortable with this issue will still find the data useful and enlightening. I should also mention that this treatise is intended to be primarily informational, not comprehensive, but as I said above, the following demonstrations speak volumes in and of themselves - much more, in fact, than all the grammatical and theoretical suppositions of modern biblical scholarship ever could. With that in view, let's proceed.

Briefly, the Tetragrammaton is composed of four Hebrew consonants - YHVH or YHWH (). The third letter in Hebrew is known as a vav and is pronounced by different proponents as either a V or a W, thus the two different spellings here. For purposes of this discussion, this particular distinction is irrelevant.

When the vowel points are added to these four consonants, the word is pronounced literally as Yehovah, or the Anglicized form, Jehovah. This is the straightforward pronunciation with the vowels. It is assumed by modern scholars that the vowels have been transferred from the word Adonai (), which means Lord. This assumption has led modern scholars to believe that the vowels that are affixed to the Tetragrammaton are either not accurate or don't belong there. There is no evidence to support this assumption. In fact, the evidence goes the other way, as we shall see, for the actual evidence suggests that the vowels are accurate and that they do belong.

Before beginning our demonstration, it becomes necessary to dispel another popular myth, namely, that the Divine Name, that is, the Tetragrammaton, was never pronounced. For example, observe this assertion -

"The Tetragrammaton was not pronounced at all..." Anchor Bible Dictionary, VI-1011

Modern biblical scholarship is bursting at the seams with myth. This is one of them. In fact, the Tetragrammaton was not only pronounced, it was pronounced frequently. There were, however, strict rules under which the Sacred Name was to be pronounced, and it was considered the greatest heresy to violate the Sacred Name by pronouncing it at the wrong time, or in the wrong place, or by the wrong person.

As the rules governing the pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton are not the focus of this paper, we will only give a few examples from the Rabbinical literature demonstrating that the Divine Name was pronounced somewhat frequently.

Speaking of Rahab the harlot - "What reward did she receive? Some of her daughters were married into the priesthood and bore sons who stood and performed service upon the altar and entered the sanctuary, where, uttering the INEFFABLE NAME OF GOD, they would bless Israel." Midrash Rabbah Numbers VIII:9

There are many other references, but these few demonstrate that the Tetragrammaton was pronounced during and before the times of Jesus. Thus, the assertion that "the Tetragrammaton was not pronounced at all" is pure myth - an habitual occurrence in modern biblical scholarship - yet, it is a myth that is unfortunately perpetuated ad nauseam, in spite of conclusive evidence to the contrary.

In the 19th century a converted Jew and Masoretic scholar, Christian Ginsburg, undertook a detailed study of the Masoretic text. In this study, he traced the pedigree of the Scriptures and noted how the Jewish guardians of the Hebrew text took safeguards in order to make sure the Tetragrammaton was not accidentally pronounced at the wrong time or by the wrong people or in the wrong place -

"There are, however, a number of compound names in the Bible into the composition of which three out of the four letters of the Incommunicable Name have entered. Moreover, these letters which begin the names in question are actually pointed Jeho, as the Tetragrammaton itself and hence in a pause at the reading of the first part of the name it sounded as if the reader was pronouncing the Ineffable Name. To guard against it an attempt was made by a certain school of redactors of the text to omit the letter He   so that the first part of the names in question has been altered from Jeho into Jo ." Christian Ginsburg, Introduction To the Massoretico-Critical Edition Of The Hebrew Bible, p 369.

Ginsburg then goes on to demonstrate from the text and the Masorah that the following names were shortened so as not to accidentally pronounce the Tetragrammaton at the wrong time, or in the wrong place, or by the wrong person -

Thus, it is clear how the ancient Jews viewed the correct pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton, for without exception the first two syllables in the above names are identical in pronunciation to the traditional pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton.

Further, the above names, as Ginsburg notes, are all derivatives of the Tetragrammaton. Like father, like son. The first two syllables in these names was pronounced the same way the Tetragrammaton was pronounced, which is why the Jews took safeguards to shorten these names in the first place. If the Jewish guardians of the Hebrew Scriptures did not consider Jehovah to be the correct pronunciation of the Ineffable Name, the above exercise in shortening the names would have been superfluous.

As an aside, it will be seen that the above names all appear in both forms in the Old Testament. In other words, both the longer forms appear, and the shorter forms appear, which merely proves that the names originally appeared in their longer forms before they were shortened, exactly as the Masorah and the text reveals, and as Ginsburg demonstrated.

Further still, it would of course be ludicrous to suppose that the vowel points for these names were transferred from Adonai (), which is the assumption leveled at the Tetragrammaton. In other words, these names, i.e., Adonai and the Tetragrammaton, these names share SIMILAR vowel points -- not EXACTLY the same -- but SIMILAR vowel points -- mark it, Adonai and the Tetragrammaton share SIMILAR vowel points, NOT the SAME vowel points -- indeed, these names share SIMILAR vowel points, yet it would be blasphemy to assert that the vowel points from Adonai () were transferred to the Tetragrammaton and the other proper names enumerated above. Thus, the assertion that these vowels were transferred to the Tetragrammaton is equally ridiculous. Of course, we are not asserting that there is no relationship between the points; what we are questioning is their ORIGIN. For example, Adonai and Elohim are almost certainly later derivations and thus SUCCEEDED the Tetragrammaton, not the reverse, but that is another subject entirely, as the permutations are quite complex. As a noted Hebraist stated --

In fact, the Tetragrammaton is older than Adonai (), as it appears much earlier in the biblical record, indicating - in complete accordance with entropy and the effects of sin - that Adam and the early patriarchs knew God in his Ineffable Majesty - which is to say, they knew Jesus Christ, who was both Jehovah Preincarnate and later Jehovah Incarnate - in his Ineffable Majesty. The earliest patriarchs' knowledge of Jesus Christ in his Ineffable Majesty was in stark contrast to the later inhabitants of earth when the image of God became more and more degraded in the minds and hearts of men due to the corrupting influences of sin, such as in the days of Noah.

It is instructive to note that the modern Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT), after going to great lengths to promote the slur, Yahweh, is forced into the following admission -

"Actually, there is a problem with the pronunciation Yahweh. It is a strange combination of old and late elements."

In other words, they can't find the evidence to support their attempt to overturn the Masoretic decrees, and up until the past couple of hundred years, the Masoretic decrees were acknowledged as having been handed down since Moses and Ezra.

A driving force in modern scholarship's assumptions concerning the Tetragrammaton is a papyrus fragment belonging to a corpus of papyri known as the Elephantine Papyri. These papyri were written in Aramaic and found in Elephantine, Egypt, an island in the Nile opposite Aswan. These documents are purported to have been written in approximately the 5th century BC. One of these contains one word in which the first three letters of the Tetragrammaton - YHV - appear.

From this discovery, and factoring in grammatical assumptions, modern scholars have assigned the pronunciation Yahweh to the Tetragrammaton. This, of course, is purely a guess, as is admitted -

"The pronunciation of yhwh as Yahweh is a scholarly guess." Anchor Bible Dictionary, VI-1011.

The same source continues with the standard laissez-faire of modern biblical scholarship, which is to peremptorily deny the Hebrew text any authority when compared to the Egyptian and Assyrian literature, even though the Hebrew text has demonstrated unerring accuracy as opposed to the gross inaccuracy of the Egyptian and Assyrian literature.  (See "The Veracity Of The Old Testament: A Scientific Validation") Accordingly, concerning the appearance of three letters of the Tetragrammaton in one of the Elephantine papyri, the same source asserts -

"The spelling of the divine name yhw (with three consonants) found in the papyri PRESUMABLY represents a form older than the biblical yhwh." Anchor Bible Dictionary, IV-1003. (emphasis added).

Presumably? Naturally. That's how the myths of modern biblical scholarship are fueled. And of course, no regenerate mind would buy into such nonsense, for the sheer blasphemy of FABRICATING the word Yahweh out of thin air and substituting it for what has been divinely handed down in the Scriptures, Jehovah, is branded so strongly as BLASPHEMY by the Holy Spirit in EVERY truly regenerate man he indwells that no truly born again Christian would fall for it for one second once he understood the dynamics involved. And of course, he who denies that is he who has never actually experienced the witness of the Holy Spirit. He has no clue as to how the Holy Spirit bears witness to his written Word. None.

Due to the pervasive cultic elements found in the Elephantine papyri, they quickly admit -

"But these texts show combinations of the name Yahweh which cannot be reconciled with what the biblical texts establish as a norm of the faith in Yahweh..." Ibid.

Modern scholarship has no evidence for the pronunciation of Yahweh WHATSOEVER. No evidence WHATSOEVER, as opposed to the actual EVIDENCE for the pronunciation of Yehovah, as shown above. The assertions are all based on assumptions - which is the standard operating principal of modern biblical scholarship,  assumptions which are in turn based upon other assumptions, ad nauseam - none of which can be substantiated. Furthermore, the born again Christian knows - and the evidence testifies - that the first words ever written by man were simply -

"In the beginning God..."

The assertion that the Hebrew text is somehow not as old as, or somehow inferior to, other literature, including the Egyptian and the Assyrian, is also pure myth, just like most everything else in modern biblical scholarship.

In closing, the historical and traditional evidence for the pronunciation of Jehovah is preponderant, some of which has just been demonstrated.

Modern scholarship's endeavors to continually alter God's Word and all its components can be summed up in these words -

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3-4

In spite of the fact that you have just seen EVIDENCE that modern biblical scholarship is ignorant to the core, you are nevertheless welcome to continue to rest in man's wisdom if you so choose. However, if you ever become born again (and you never will as long you rest in all these modern humanistic philosophies of men), but if you ever become born again, you will change your position on this and so many other matters related to the written Word of God, for you will -- if you ever become born again -- have the infallible witness of the Holy Spirit to guide you into all truth. In the meantime --

Let the born again Christian who can clearly see the Pre-Incarnate Christ, even Yehovah, who is Yehoshua, who is Yeshua, who is Jesus, walking in the garden in the cool of the day, stick to the old paths, as it is written -

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls." Jeremiah 6:16

Amen.